Saying I'm not skilled at photography would be an understatement, barely good enough is more accurate. I've been trying to get used to the more professional standard DSLRs that the uni has and for a while I was doing pretty well. I did 2 photo shoots with my models and while I now realise I did make some relatively obvious and simple mistakes (not framing the model properly, having the photos be in the wrong format) none of these were awful they just gave me a bit of extra work to make them serviceable. I had had some trouble with the camera going out of focus but with some lens adjustment and some simple setting changes I could always get the image sharp enough to draw from (probably not to be a usable photograph in it's own right though).
When it came to my third model however the camera just would not focus, at all. The worst thing was some of the images looked okay on the camera at least only to be a blurry mess when I uploaded the photos. I've since realised how to properly focus a camera and make sure it stays focused but that doesn't change that I've wasted a session with a model (one unwilling to come in again). Some of the photos are actually usable because although I'm awful at photography I can make up for it with my drawings, however I can't really use the photos to make large scale work that I'm thinking of because too much of the detail has simply been lost.
I can always take more photos of other models but I'm ideally going for a specific style that is hard to find in Huddersfield, even the current models are a pretty big compromise. I'm going to start being less uptight about the models I work from though otherwise I simply won't have enough material to work from to create what I want to achieve.
Since taking these photos I have been to a photography workshop and now know where I went wrong and how to take far far clearer and visually appealing photos.
Wednesday, 17 February 2016
Wednesday, 3 February 2016
Books of Research
I've talked about things I've searched earlier in my blog but due to not having or taking note of the books I've took information from I never actually mentioned the original books I got the information that backs my research from. I recently realised it would be best if I took not of these books so have tried to track them down.
Dolphin, G. (2004). Everything in Vogue. Manchester: Cornerhouse Publications
Packer, W. (1980). The Art og Vogue Covers 1909-1940. Twickenham, Hamlyn Publishing
These are the only two I can re-find at the moment, there were at least a couple more. Both books and the others, hopefully soon to be referenced were centred around art in fashion magazine (primarily Vogue) which helped me distinguish between the use of photograph and illustration within the magazine. Showing whether or not the kind of pictures I draw up are suitable for a magazine and not pale imitations or husks of what fashion illustration has seemed to become
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)